Takaisin Tulosta

Karkea arvio tutkimusten soveltuvuudesta ja raportoinnin kattavuudesta suomalaisen päätöksenteon näkökulmasta arvioituna

Käypä hoito -kuvat
Käypä hoito -työryhmä Psoriaasi (iho ja nivelet)
1.3.2017
Kuva 1.

Karkea arvio nivelpsoriaasitutkimusten soveltuvuudesta Suomeen ja raportoinnin kattavuudesta terveystalousohjeeseen (Lääkkeiden hintalautakunta; www.hila.fi) perustuen.

© Suomalainen Lääkäriseura Duodecim

Kirjallisuutta

  1. STM. Terveystaloudellisen selvityksen laatiminen lääkevalmisteen korvattavuus- ja tukkuhintahakemukseen. Lääkkeiden hintalautakunta; 2015, www «http://www.hila.fi/c/document_library/get_file?folderId=792380&name=DLFE-9119.pdf»1
  2. Bansback NJ, Ara R, Barkham N ym. Estimating the cost and health status consequences of treatment with TNF antagonists in patients with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006;45:1029-38 «PMID: 16782734»PubMed
  3. Bojke L, Claxton K, Bravo-Vergel Y ym. Eliciting distributions to populate decision analytic models. Value Health 2010;13:557-64 «PMID: 20345548»PubMed
  4. Bojke L, Epstein D, Craig D ym. Modelling the cost-effectiveness of biologic treatments for psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50 Suppl 4:iv39-iv47 «PMID: 21859705»PubMed
  5. Bravo Vergel Y, Hawkins NS, Claxton K ym. The cost-effectiveness of etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of patients with psoriatic arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2007;46:1729-35 «PMID: 17956918»PubMed
  6. Cawson MR, Mitchell SA, Knight C ym. Systematic review, network meta-analysis and economic evaluation of biological therapy for the management of active psoriatic arthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2014;15:26 «PMID: 24444034»PubMed
  7. Cummins E, Asseburg C, Punekar YS ym. Cost-effectiveness of infliximab for the treatment of active and progressive psoriatic arthritis. Value Health 2011;14:15-23 «PMID: 21211482»PubMed
  8. Cummins E, Asseburg C, Prasad M ym. Cost effectiveness of golimumab for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis. Eur J Health Econ 2012;13:801-9 «PMID: 21720868»PubMed
  9. Epstein D, Sutton A. Modelling correlated clinical outcomes in health technology appraisal. Value Health 2011;14:793-9 «PMID: 21914498»PubMed
  10. O'Connor J, Rice S, Smith A ym. The Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Ustekinumab for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: A Critique of the Evidence. Pharmacoeconomics 2016;34:337-48 «PMID: 26818809»PubMed
  11. Rodgers M, Epstein D, Bojke L ym. Etanercept, infliximab and adalimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2011;15:i-xxi, 1-329 «PMID: 21333232»PubMed
  12. Woolacott N, Bravo Vergel Y, Hawkins N ym. Etanercept and infliximab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 2006;10:iii-iv, xiii-xvi, 1-239 «PMID: 16948890»PubMed
  13. Yang H, Epstein D, Bojke L ym. Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Health Technol Assess 2011;15 Suppl 1:87-95 «PMID: 21609657»PubMed
  14. Yang H, Craig D, Epstein D ym. Golimumab for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a NICE single technology appraisal. Pharmacoeconomics 2012;30:257-70 «PMID: 22283690»PubMed