Takaisin

Tofacitinib treatment in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: effectiveness compared to placebo

Näytönastekatsaukset
Raija Sipilä
10.11.2021

Level of evidence: B

Tofacitinib treatment at the dose of 5 mg twice daily, when compared to placebo, seems to increase the proportion of patients with active psoriatic arthritis achieving the ACR20 response at week 12 (50–60 % vs. 25–30 %).

The proportion of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and treated with tofacitinib achieving ACR50 and ACR 70 response at week 12 may be higher compared to patients treated with placebo. The safety profile may be similar to placebo.

Table 1. Description of the included studies
Ref. Study type Population Intervention and comparison Outcomes Risk of bias
RCT=randomized controlled trial. ARC20=20% improvement in signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis according to American College of Rheumatology criteria, TOF=tofacitinib
«Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or A...»1 RCT 316 TNFi-naïve adults (>18) with active psoriatic arthritis receiving one background csDMARD and inadequate response to at least 1 csDMARD. TOF 5 or 10 mg twice daily vs. placebo Primary: ACR20 and HAQ-DI at week 12;
Secondary: ACR50, ACR70, PASI75 adverse events
Low
«Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for...»2 RCT 395 adults with active psoriatic arthritis receiving one background csDMARD and with inadequate response to at least one TNFi TOF 5 or 10 mg twice daily vs. placebo Primary: ACR20 and HAQ-DI at week 12;
Secondary: ACR50, ACR70, PASI75 adverse events
Low
Table 2. Additional comments for included studies
Reference Comments
«Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or A...»1 Phase 3 multicenter, double-blind RCT, included in the pooled analysis [1]. All patients received one background csDMARD throughout the study. One arm was randomized to subcutaneous adalimumab and therefore blinding is not entirely possible. There was some unbalance in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Placebo group was switched to tofacitinib at 3 months. Follow-up up to 1 year.
The study was funded by Pfizer Inc.
«Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for...»2 Phase 3 multicenter, double-blind RCT, included in the pooled analysis [1]. All patients received one background csDMARD throughout the study. There was some unbalance in the baseline characteristics between the groups. Placebo group was switched to tofacitinib at 3 months. Follow-up up to 6 months. 84-93% completed the trial.
The study was funded by Pfizer Inc.

Results

Table 3. ACR20 at week 12
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time, weeks Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Absolute difference vs. placebo (95% CI)*
I= intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval, TOF=tofacitinib
* Not stated in the publication
«Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or A...»1 1 RCT
316 (107 TOF 5 mg/ 104 TOF 10 mg / 55 placebo)
12 TOF 5mg: 54 (50.0)
TOF 10 mg: 63 (61.0)
35 (33) 17 %
28 %
«Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for...»2 1 RCT
395 (131 TOF 5 mg/ 132 TOF 10 mg / 131 placebo)
12 TOF 5mg: 65 (50.0)
TOF 10 mg: 62 (47)
31 (24) 26 %
23 %
Level of evidence: moderate
The level of evidence is downgraded due to imprecision (no confidence intervals reported).
Table 4. ACR50 at week 12. The ACR50 response at 24 weeks was tested as a secondary end point.
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time, weeks Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Absolute difference vs. placebo (95% CI)*
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval, TOF=tofacitinib
* Not stated in the publication
«Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or A...»1 1 RCT
316 (107 TOF 5 mg/ 104 TOF 10 mg / 55 placebo)
12 TOF 5mg: 30 (28)
TOF 10 mg: 42 (40)
10 (10) 18 %
30 %
«Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for...»2 1 RCT
395 (131 TOF 5 mg/ 132 TOF 10 mg / 131 placebo)
12 TOF 5mg: 29 (30)
TOF 10 mg: 37 (28)
19 (15) 15%
22 %
Level of evidence: moderate
The level of evidence is downgraded due to imprecision (no confidence intervals reported).
Table 5. ACR70 at week 12
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Absolute difference vs. placebo (95% CI)*
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval, TOF=tofacitinib
* Not stated in the publication
«Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or A...»1 1 RCT
316 (107 TOF 5 mg/ 104 TOF 10 mg / 55 placebo)
12 TOF 5mg: 18 (17)
TOF 10 mg: 15 (14)
5 (5) 12 %
9 %
«Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for...»2 1 RCT
395 (131 TOF 5 mg/ 132 TOF 10 mg / 131 placebo)
12 TOF 5mg: 22 (17)
TOF 10 mg: 19 (14)
13 (10) 7 %
4 %
Level of evidence: moderate
The level of evidence is downgraded due to imprecision (no confidence intervals reported).
Table 6. Adverse events at week 12
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time, weeks Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Absolute difference vs. placebo (95% CI)
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval, TOF=tofacitinib
«Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or A...»1 1 RCT
316 (107 TOF 5 mg/ 104 TOF 10 mg / 55 placebo)
12 At least one AE TOF 5 mg (39)
TOF 10 mg: (45)
Serious AE 1 TOF 5 mg (3)
TOF 10 mg: (1)
At least one AE (35)
Serious AE 1 (1)
NA
«Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for...»2 1 RCT
395 (131 TOF 5 mg/ 132 TOF 10 mg / 131 placebo)
12 At least one AE TOF 5 mg 72 (55)
TOF 10 mg: 70 (53)
Serious AE 1 TOF 5 mg 1 (1)
TOF 10 mg: 3 (2)
At least one AE 58 (44)
Serious AE 1 3 (2)
NA
Level of evidence: low

References

  1. Mease P, Hall S, FitzGerald O ym. Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo for Psoriatic Arthritis. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1537-1550 «PMID: 29045212»PubMed
  2. Gladman D, Rigby W, Azevedo VF ym. Tofacitinib for Psoriatic Arthritis in Patients with an Inadequate Response to TNF Inhibitors. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1525-1536 «PMID: 29045207»PubMed