Takaisin

Antidepressants in pain of patients having irritable bowel syndrome

Näytönastekatsaukset
Pekka Mäntyselkä and Katri Hamunen
3.3.2026

Level of evidence: B

Antidepressants likely alleviate pain in patients with irritable bowel syndrome.

A systematic review with meta-analysis «Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 compared antidepressants with placebo and found a favorable effect on general symptoms of IBS with tricyclic and SSRI antidepressants and specifically on abdominal pain with tricyclic antidepressants. Antidepressants increased the total adverse events (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.23–1.98). Drowsiness and dry mouth were the most common adverse effects. The study did not report estimates for specific adverse events.

The largest RCT to this day including 463 patients compared low dose tricyclic antidepressants with placebo and found effect on general symptoms and abdominal pain. At 6 months follow up, Intervention group had a mean of −27,0 points (−46,9 to −7,1) less symptoms (IBS-SSS) compared to control (about 14% less than control group).

Table 1. Description of the included studies
Reference Study type Population Intervention and comparison Outcomes Risk of bias
RCT=randomized controlled trial; SR=systematic review; MA=meta-analysis; SGA= Subjective global assessment
«Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 SR/MA Patients 16 years or older, with a diagnosis of IBS based on clinician's opinion or specific diagnostic criteria. Minimum duration of therapy and follow-up ≥ 7 days Antidepressant or placebo Effect assessed based on global IBS symptoms or abdominal pain (proportion of patients without improvement) High
«Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amit...»2 RCT 18 years or older, with a primary care diagnosis of IBS having
tried first-line treatments
Titrated low-dose oral amitriptyline
or placebo
for 6 months
Primary (1):
IBS symptoms, measured by the IBS-SSS at 6 months
Secondary (2): relief of IBS symptoms (SGA) at 6 months
High
Table 2. Additional comments for included studies
Reference Comments
«Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 Dropout rates varied between 0-48%. Most trials had insufficient reporting of allocation concealment.
«Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amit...»2 25% drop out rate.
Inclusion criteria: First line treatments including dietary changes and lifestyle advice, soluble fibre, antispasmodics, laxatives, or antidiarrhoeals, without success, had active symptoms, scoring ≥ on the IBS-SSS, normal haemoglobin,
white cell and platelet count, and C-reactive protein within 6 months; negative anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies; no evidence of suicidal ideation
Main exclusion criteria: meeting fast-track referral criteria for other bowel diseases, pregnancy, breastfeeding; current use of, or allergy or contraindications to, a tricyclic antidepressant

Results

Table 3. Outcome 1: Patient reported improvement of symptoms: all studied antidepressants
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Relative effect (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 18 RCT with 1127 patients (I 612, C 515) 1-3 months 266 345 RR 0.66 (0.57-0.76)
Table 4. Outcome 2: Patient reported improvement of symptoms: tricyclic antidepressants
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Relative effect (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 12 RCTs; 787 patients (I 436, C 351) 1-3 months 186 224 0.65 (0.55-0.77)
Table 5. Outcome 3: Patient reported improvement of symptoms: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Relative effect (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 7 RCTs; 357 patients (I 176, C 180) 1-3 months 80 121 RR 0.68 (0.51–0.91)
Table 6. Outcome 4: Patient reported improvement of PAIN
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Absolute number of events (%) I Absolute number of events (%) C Relative effect (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Anti...»1 7 RCTs; 351 patients (I 182, C 169) 1.5-3 months 87 123 RR 0.62 (0.43-0.88)
Table 7. Outcome 5: IBS symptoms, measured by the IBS-SSS at 6 months
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Absolute change in outcome I Absolute change in outcome measure (points in IBS-SSS) C Relative effect (95% CI)
Level of evidence: low
The quality of evidence is downgraded due to study limitations and imprecision.
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amit...»2 232/231 6 m -99.2 -68.9 -27.0 (-46.9 to -7.1)

References

  1. Ford AC, Lacy BE, Harris LA, et al. Effect of Antidepressants and Psychological Therapies in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2019;114(1):21-39 «PMID: 30177784»PubMed
  2. Ford AC, Wright-Hughes A, Alderson SL, et al. Amitriptyline at Low-Dose and Titrated for Irritable Bowel Syndrome as Second-Line Treatment in primary care (ATLANTIS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023;402(10414):1773-1785 «PMID: 37858323»PubMed