Takaisin Tulosta

Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold

Evidence summaries
22.12.2022 • Completely updated
Editors

Level of evidence: C

Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant combinations may have some general benefit for adults and older children with common cold.

The quality of evidence is downgraded by study quality (unclear allocation concealment) and inconsistency (heterogeneity in design, participants, interventions and outcomes).

A Cochrane review «Oral antihistamine‐decongestant‐analgesic combinations for the common cold»1 «De Sutter AI, Eriksson L, van Driel ML. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022;(1):CD004976. »1 included 30 studies with a total of 6304 participants with common cold. The control intervention was placebo in 26 trials and an active substance (paracetamol, chlorphenindione + phenylpropanolamine + belladonna, diphenhydramine) in six trials. The trials took place in different settings: university clinics, paediatric departments, family medicine departments, and general practice surgeries.

  • Antihistamine-decongestant: 14 trials (1298 participants). The OR of treatment failure was 0.31 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.48); NNTB 3.9 (95% CI 3.03 to 5.2). On the final evaluation day (follow-up: 3 to 10 days), 55% of participants in the placebo group had a favourable response compared to 70% on active treatment. Adverse effects: the antihistamine-decongestant group experienced more adverse effects than the control group: 128/419 (31%) versus 100/423 (13%) participants suffered one or more adverse effects (OR 1.58, 95%CI 0.78 to 3.21).
  • Antihistamine-analgesic: 4 trials (1608 participants). The OR of treatment failure was 0.33 (95% CI 0.23 to 0.46); NNTB 6.67 (95% CI 4.76 to 12.5). 43% of participants in the control group and 70% in the active treatment group were cured after six days of treatment. Adverse effects: there were not significantly more adverse effects in the active treatment group compared to placebo (drowsiness, hypersomnia, sleepiness 10/152 versus 4/120); OR 1.64 (95 % CI 0.48 to 5.59).
  • Analgesic-decongestant: 7 trials (2575 participants). One trial reported on global effectiveness: 73% of participants in the analgesic-decongestant group reported a benefit compared with 52% in the control group (paracetamol) (OR of treatment failure 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.52; NNTB 4.7). Adverse effects: the decongestant-analgesic group experienced significantly more adverse effects than the control group (199/1122 versus 75/675); OR 1.62 95% CI 1.18 to 2.23; NNTH 17.
  • Antihistamine-analgesic-decongestant: 6 trials (1014 participants). Five trials reported on global effectiveness, of which two studies in adults could be pooled: global effect reported with active treatment (52%) and placebo (34%) was equivalent to a difference of less than one point on a four- or five-point scale; the OR of treatment failure was 0.47 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.67); NNTB 5.6 (95% CI 3.8 to 10.2). One trial in children aged 2 to 12 years, and two trials in adults found no beneficial effect. Adverse effects: in one trial 5/224 (2%) suffered adverse effects with the active treatment versus 9/208 (4%) with placebo. Two other trials reported no differences between treatment groups.

References

  1. De Sutter AI, Eriksson L, van Driel ML. Oral antihistamine-decongestant-analgesic combinations for the common cold. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2022;(1):CD004976. «PMID: 35060618»PubMed