Takaisin

Pelvic floor muscle exercise for urinary incontinence

Näytönastekatsaukset
Olavi Airaksinen ja Aleksi Raudasoja
31.3.2026

Näytön aste: B

Pelvic floor muscle exercise likely decreases the urinary incontinence symptoms.

In a Cochrane systematic review «Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic flo...»1 pelvic floor muscle exercises training (PFMT) increased the perceived cure rate from 6% in control to 56% in the intervention group (4 RCTs, 165 patients). The number of leakage episodes decreased by 1.23 per 24 h (95% CI 1.78-0.68), translating to about 54% reduction in number of leakage episodes. In all studies, stress incontinence (SUI) was classified as mild or moderate.

Adverse events were rare and mild – mostly discomfort or pressure at pelvic floor area.

The quality of evidence was limited due to high risk of bias (lack of blinding and incomplete outcome data).

Taulukko 1. Description of the included studies.
Reference Study type Population Intervention and comparison Outcomes Risk of bias
RCT=randomized controlled trial; SR=systematic review; MA=meta-analysis
«Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic flo...»1 SR/MA Adult women with incontinence symptoms Strengthening exercise vs placebo or no treatment. Improvement of SUI symptoms, quality of life by I-QOL. adverse events high
Taulukko 2. Additional comments for included studies.
Reference Comments
«Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic flo...»1 All trials were small and non-blinded. Most of the analyses used fixed effects model. Trials tested supervised exercise training programs of from 3 to 6 months vs placebo or inactive control with SUI patients.

Results

Taulukko 3. Outcome 1: Participant perceived cure of SUI symptoms.
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Events I Events C Risk ratio (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence was limited due to high risk of bias.
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic flo...»1 4 studies (82/83) 3-6 months 46 (56 %) 5 (6 %) 8.38 (3.68 to 19.07)
Taulukko 4. Outcome 2: Participant perceived cure or improvement.
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Events I Events C Risk ratio (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence was limited due to high risk of bias.
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic flo...»1 3 studies (119/123) 3-6 months 88 (74 %) 14 (11 %) 6.33 (3.88 to 10.33)
Taulukko 5. Outcome 3. Number of leakage episodes in 24 hours.
Reference Number of studies and number of patients (I/C) Follow-up time Mean (sd) I Mean (sd) C Mean difference (95% CI)
Level of evidence: moderate
The quality of evidence was limited due to high risk of bias.
*Calculated from individual study means.
I=intervention; C=comparison; CI=confidence interval
«Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic flo...»1 7 studies (219/213) 3-6 months 2.28* -1.23 (-1.78 to -0.68)

Kirjallisuutta

  1. Dumoulin C, Cacciari LP, Hay-Smith EJC. Pelvic floor muscle training versus no treatment, or inactive control treatments, for urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;10(10):CD005654 «PMID: 30288727»PubMed