Takaisin Tulosta

Hoidon komplikaatiot ja kohdunkaulan ahtautuminen

Lisätietoa aiheesta
Käypä hoito -työryhmä Kohdunkaulan, emättimen ja ulkosynnytinten solumuutokset

Kipu toimenpiteen aikana


  1. Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A ym. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;:CD001318 «PMID: 24302546»PubMed
  2. Berget A, Andreasson B, Bock JE ym. Outpatient treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. The CO2 laser versus cryotherapy, a randomized trial. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1987;66:531-6 «PMID: 3321872»PubMed
  3. Bostofte E, Berget A, Falck Larsen J ym. Conization by carbon dioxide laser or cold knife in the treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1986;65:199-202 «PMID: 3090849»PubMed
  4. Kristensen GB, Jensen LK, Hølund B. A randomized trial comparing two methods of cold knife conization with laser conization. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:1009-13 «PMID: 2234708»PubMed
  5. Larsson G, Alm P, Grundsell H. Laser conization versus cold knife conization. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1982;154:59-61 «PMID: 7053590»PubMed
  6. Crane JM. Pregnancy outcome after loop electrosurgical excision procedure: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol 2003;102:1058-62 «PMID: 14672487»PubMed
  7. Santos C, Galdos R, Alvarez M ym. One-Session Management of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia: A Solution for Developing Countries. A Prospective, Randomized Trial of LEEP versus Laser Excisional Conization Gynecol Oncol 1996;61:11-5 «PMID: 8812512»PubMed
  8. Alvarez RD, Helm CW, Edwards RP ym. Prospective randomized trial of LLETZ versus laser ablation in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Gynecol Oncol 1994;52:175-9 PubMed
  9. Mathevet P, Dargent D, Roy M ym. A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP. Gynecol Oncol 1994;54:175-9 «PMID: 8063242»PubMed