Takaisin Tulosta

Variability in evaluating ONH progression

Lisätietoa aiheesta
Glaucoma Working Group
28.3.2023

The evaluation of progression from disc images shows large variability (agreement between 54–92%, on average 72%).

Kirjallisuutta

  1. Chee RI, Silva FQ, Ehrlich JR ym. Agreement of flicker chronoscopy for structural glaucomatous progression detection and factors associated with progression. Am J Ophthalmol 2013;155:983-990.e1 «PMID: 23462231»PubMed
  2. Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B ym. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression: results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1268-79 «PMID: 12365904»PubMed
  3. Girkin CA, Emdadi A, Sample PA ym. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and standard perimetry in the detection of progressive optic disc cupping. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1231-6 «PMID: 10980768»PubMed
  4. Caprioli J, Prum B, Zeyen T. Comparison of methods to evaluate the optic nerve head and nerve fiber layer for glaucomatous change. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;121:659-67 «PMID: 8644809»PubMed
  5. Coleman AL, Sommer A, Enger C ym. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the detection of glaucomatous progression of the optic disc. J Glaucoma 1996;5:384-9 «PMID: 8946294»PubMed
  6. Heijl A, Bengtsson B. Diagnosis of early glaucoma with flicker comparisons of serial disc photographs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1989;30:2376-84 «PMID: 2807794»PubMed