Variability of visual field examinations

Kirjallisuutta

1. Heijl A, Drance SM. Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 1983;67:512-6 «PMID: 6871143»PubMed
2. Langerhorst C. The fatigue phenomenon in prolonged threshold testing. In automated perimetry in glaucoma. Kugler Publications, 1988, s. 53-65
3. Hudson C, Wild JM, O'Neill EC. Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:268-80 «PMID: 8300355»PubMed
4. Birt CM, Shin DH, Samudrala V ym. Analysis of reliability indices from Humphrey visual field tests in an urban glaucoma population. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1126-30 «PMID: 9224465»PubMed
5. Heijl A. Time changes of contrast thresholds during automatic perimetry. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1977;55:696-708 «PMID: 578374»PubMed
6. Heijl A, Lindgren G, Olsson J. Normal variability of static perimetric threshold values across the central visual field. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1544-9 «PMID: 3675288»PubMed
7. Lewis RA, Johnson CA, Keltner JL ym. Variability of quantitative automated perimetry in normal observers. Ophthalmology 1986;93:878-81 «PMID: 3763131»PubMed
8. Blumenthal EZ, Sample PA, Zangwill L ym. Comparison of long-term variability for standard and short-wavelength automated perimetry in stable glaucoma patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:309-13 «PMID: 10704545»PubMed
9. Bengtsson B, Heijl A, Olsson J. Evaluation of a new threshold visual field strategy, SITA, in normal subjects. Swedish Interactive Thresholding Algorithm. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:165-9 «PMID: 9591946»PubMed
10. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Evaluation of a new perimetric threshold strategy, SITA, in patients with manifest and suspect glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:268-72 «PMID: 9686835»PubMed
11. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Inter-subject variability and normal limits of the SITA Standard, SITA Fast, and the Humphrey Full Threshold computerized perimetry strategies, SITA STATPAC. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:125-9 «PMID: 10321523»PubMed
12. Bengtsson B, Heijl A. Comparing significance and magnitude of glaucomatous visual field defects using the SITA and Full Threshold strategies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1999;77:143-6 «PMID: 10321527»PubMed
13. Bengtsson B, Lindgren A, Heijl A ym. Perimetric probability maps to separate change caused by glaucoma from that caused by cataract. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:184-8 «PMID: 9197570»PubMed
14. Bengtsson B. Reliability of computerized perimetric threshold tests as assessed by reliability indices and threshold reproducibility in patients with suspect and manifest glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2000;78:519-22 «PMID: 11037906»PubMed
15. Wild JM, Pacey IE, Hancock SA ym. Between-algorithm, between-individual differences in normal perimetric sensitivity: full threshold, FASTPAC, and SITA. Swedish Interactive Threshold algorithm. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:1152-61 «PMID: 10235548»PubMed
16. Glass E, Schaumberger M, Lachenmayr BJ. Simulations for FASTPAC and the standard 4-2 dB full-threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1847-54 «PMID: 7635658»PubMed
17. Schaumberger M, Schäfer B, Lachenmayr BJ. Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:1390-7 «PMID: 7775117»PubMed
18. Flanagan JG, Wild JM, Trope GE. Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population. Ophthalmology 1993;100:949-54 «PMID: 8510911»PubMed
19. O'Brien C, Poinoosawmy D, Wu J ym. Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:516-9 «PMID: 7918261»PubMed
20. Weber J, Klimaschka T. Test time and efficiency of the dynamic strategy in glaucoma perimetry. Ger J Ophthalmol 1995;4:25-31 «PMID: 7612076»PubMed
21. Maeda H, Nakaura M, Negi A. New perimetric threshold test algorithm with dynamic strategy and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucomatous eyes. Eye (Lond) 2000;14 Pt 5:747-51 «PMID: 11116697»PubMed
22. Morales J, Weitzman ML, González de la Rosa M. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology 2000;107:134-42 «PMID: 10647732»PubMed
23. Lachkar Y, Barrault O, Lefrançois A ym. [Rapid Tendency Oriented Perimeter (TOP) with the Octopus visual field analyzer]. J Fr Ophtalmol 1998;21:180-4 «PMID: 9759403»PubMed
24. Anderson DR, Feuer WJ, Alward WL ym. Threshold equivalence between perimeters. Am J Ophthalmol 1989;107:493-505 «PMID: 2712132»PubMed
25. Leske MC, Heijl A, Hyman L ym. Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial: design and baseline data. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2144-53 «PMID: 10571351»PubMed
26. Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:573-83 «PMID: 10326953»PubMed
27. Musch DC, Lichter PR, Guire KE ym. The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: study design, methods, and baseline characteristics of enrolled patients. Ophthalmology 1999;106:653-62 «PMID: 10201583»PubMed